![]() ![]() It covers the following contentious territory: (1) push for student outcomes (2) pushback against student outcomes (3) definition of value-added models (VAMs) (4) validity and reliability of VAM scores (5) standards for using VAM and (6) conclusions and recommendations. The purpose of this article is to synthesize what has already been learned in order to furnish guidelines for practice. Since 2014, the bubbling continued with some clarification of the issues, numerous research studies in the public sector, and several significant publications and policy statements that can guide current practices. For example, a medical thermometer is a reliable tool that would measure the correct temperature each time it is used. You can also think of it as the ability for a test or research findings to be repeatable. ![]() ![]() It remains a bubbling cauldron of controversy. Reliability is a measure of the stability or consistency of test scores. Recently, student outcomes have bubbled to the top of debates about how to evaluate teaching in community and liberal arts colleges, universities, and professional schools, but even more international attention has been riveted on how outcomes are being used to evaluate teachers and administrators K-12 (Harris, 2012 Rowen & Raudenbush, 2016 Sawchuk, 2014). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |